Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 15:43:12 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen) Cc: eischen@vigrid.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Copyright question Message-ID: <199605082243.PAA26988@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <9605082158.AA09404@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from "Daniel Eischen" at May 8, 96 05:58:27 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'll try to see if I can get rid of clause 4, but I don't think > they're going to let it go without some sort of clause. Is there > anything we can do? Add a comment in LINT saying it's restricted > by copyright? Or point to a file from within LINT that will list > the restricted driver(s)? As long as the user sees the copyright > restriction before he rebuilds the kernel with the driver, right? If devfs and LKM were fully integrated, you could distribute it as a binary loadable, no source required. This assumes that it's not ever going to be used to run the console or other boot-critical uses (ie: somewhat limited utility). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605082243.PAA26988>