Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:24:26 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233546] devel/psptoolchain-gcc-stage1: Fix build conflict when texinfo installed and when -march is set in env
Message-ID:  <bug-233546-7788-ugUYF3ClaR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-233546-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-233546-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233546

--- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Tassilo Philipp from comment #9)

It's for anyone looking at the issue (to ascertain its 'current state', but=
 it
mostly applies to committers looking to take/assign the issue to themselves,
and maintainers.

I should have @Tassilo when i said "Confirmation that this change passes QA
(portlint, poudriere) would be helpful", but i did also set maintainer-feed=
back
to ? your-email

In future you can take it when someone sets that flag to 'we would like
something from you', either a question answered, additional information, an
updated patch, or in this case, QA confirmation

As far as what kind of QA is desired, in most if not all cases, portlint and
poudriere passing is the best kind (at minimum), not including runtime test=
s or
test suites passing, which of course are better.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233546-7788-ugUYF3ClaR>