Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 14:02:16 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: tcobb@staff.circle.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: SMP and libc_r Message-ID: <XFMail.990222140216.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <A0CFA284C004D211B7EE0060082F32A412E275@freya.circle.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22-Feb-99 tcobb@staff.circle.net wrote: > > Not yet anyway :) > That's what I was afraid of. This awaits kernel-threads, eh? Well, kernel threads exist, its just that the thread lib doesn't use them, AFAIK anyway... > > works really badly on multiple IO intensive apps (because > > the all wait for the big kernel > > lock) > I find it strange that it should perform worse than a single > CPU kernel on the same tests, though. Yeah, but I think it depends what else is going on... > Correct me if I'm wrong, but, if I throw alot of memory at > MySQL and get it to cache the more frequently-accessed > tables then I should be able to work around this? It sounds reasonable to me :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990222140216.doconnor>