From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 08:04:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 680) id 5FEFA16A4CF; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:04:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:04:14 +0000 From: Darren Reed To: Ken Smith Message-ID: <20041220080414.GA73000@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200412171559.iBHFxGm1066750@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041217163240.GD20065@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041217163240.GD20065@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Darren Reed cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet ip_nat.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:04:14 -0000 On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:32:40AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > > We understand that some of you do extensive testing before committing > even to HEAD, and we appreciate that. But even for those cases re@ > would appreciate it if things could simmer in HEAD for at least a > couple of days before being MFCed. Even the best of us have been > caught off guard with things that didn't show up in our testing but > once it got out into a larger testbed a nit or two showed up. With > RELENG_5 now considered -stable unless there is some sort of emergency > please follow the 3-day or so simmer-in-HEAD rule of thumb. Hmm, I was wondering if this would raise the eyes of anyone... it's more that for me the command line was something like this: cvs commit freebsd{,-5}/src/... but maybe it's not that different for others. Anyway, I'll take your comments forward and let changes rest in current first, for a little while, before "MFC'ing" them, in future. Cheers, Darren