From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 13:13:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A250E16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD28B43D58 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:13:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from ppp8-147.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([81.195.8.147] helo=ciam.ru) by mail.ciam.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1BDql4-0002xj-KW; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:13:18 +0400 Message-ID: <407D9B6E.1090503@ciam.ru> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:13:34 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 20:13:20 -0000 One more thought I got from russian mail-list: some users like to have local patches in file/ dirrectory. Because of CVS don't know these files they're keeped untouched on update. -- Sem.