From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 16 23:39:14 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B32106566B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 May 2009 23:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC82B8FC1C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 May 2009 23:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1533519ywe.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 16 May 2009 16:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=C6r5kocZ0f1yvFxCYlNRsUqY44kLMHLiUKX1DwEGr2k=;
	b=gnhgfSSodNxYJa/0XpOTK3Ct76WgBA6cdVDgL51Mk9mkh0IcT2OXqG2j9uD7eqP7S1
	oqU83iR4TjFbGCmvgot7+oiGGvesC2D9Ak6SAcBZCN0o+zCIIR8cmz6LIJ0Tfh7oWuRY
	iOcG4eVJ7TtyUeUmQ7L1lKrRBHoEB56pV0thQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=lVEQUUSHTA/eFT3NfZHmfTuT7HXSIuAfya7A/mEHL9H5PcCd1j+VIFoeE+bJlILK89
	dBUWkqV2NZhE5DLB2vfNqHlhM4+tVVFZvrMpzDIfZHLARZWHMVnpdzQWBMlF7NE7UvOB
	jSk+gb2x5GszMiZGzJF8tWYyMnPeNKzBRFZ1A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.178.9 with SMTP id a9mr6253624anf.11.1242517153204; Sat, 
	16 May 2009 16:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905161134510.50084@FGD135.localdomain> 
	<4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com>
From: matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:38:53 -0400
Message-ID: <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, wenheping@gmail.com, cy@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:39:14 -0000

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>wrote:

> Josh Rickmar wrote:
> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc.
> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do
> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed
> > replacement for screen.)
> >
> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ?  the NO_PACKAGE in
> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good
> replacement I'm so there.
>
>
>
tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in  X it works wonders.