From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 17 1:31:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639A61100B for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:31:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id BAA02232; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:31:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:31:51 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902170931.BAA02232@apollo.backplane.com> To: tcobb@staff.circle.net Cc: green@unixhelp.org, khetan@chain.freebsd.os.org.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: Problems in VM structure ? References: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :I'm seeing different responses depending on hardware. : :On regular Pentium 166 machines, I almost NEVER get :a panic. On brand-new Pentium II 350s, I get a panic :every 6-9 hours. This happens when both kernels are :configured the same for maxusers. It happens when :both machines are under the same load level -- the :P5 stays rock solid, the P6 flakes out. : :What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs :is partly at fault? : :-Troy Cobb : Circle Net, Inc. : http://www.circle.net With what config? Have you tried reducing maxusers to 128? -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message