From owner-freebsd-security Sat Aug 18 11:47:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cithaeron.argolis.org (bgm-24-169-175-136.stny.rr.com [24.169.175.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217F137B412 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from piechota@argolis.org) Received: from localhost (piechota@localhost) by cithaeron.argolis.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7IIlgO11063; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:47:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from piechota@argolis.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cithaeron.argolis.org: piechota owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:47:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Piechota To: "H. Wade Minter" Cc: Subject: RE: Silly crackers... NT is for kids... In-Reply-To: <26359.63.167.1.26.998076075.squirrel@webmail.skiltech.com> Message-ID: <20010818144512.P4969-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, H. Wade Minter wrote: > Well, there could be a case where the Powers That Be with the corporate > firewall allow telnet out, but refuse to allow SSH out, and no amount of > rational argument will convince them to do otherwise. > > Not that I'm currently living that, no. I feel your pain, bother. The best thing I've been able to figure out is to use SSLTelnet. I've been meaning to try running ssh on port 23, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. -- Matt Piechota Finger piechota@emailempire.com for PGP key AOL IM: cithaeron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message