Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 08:14:17 +0600 (ESD) From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: EDO & Memory latency Message-ID: <199605170214.IAA04026@hq.icb.chel.su> In-Reply-To: <199605161715.KAA17388@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at May 16, 96 10:15:24 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > The processor's internal conveyer size is at most 5 (?) > > steps, for 13ns cycle this give 65ns for the maximal processor overhead. > > The memory refresh can add about 15% of overhead, 60ns*0.15=9ns. In sum we > > get 80+40+65+9=~=295ns. But the remaining 200ns are a real mystery for me. > > Yeah, that's my ~280 number. (ugh. I just relaized I labelled the > units in my last post as uS). 400 - 295 = 105, so there's about half > of your mystery for you. 8-). Nope :-) These 400 were (500-80) rounded to 100. -SB
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605170214.IAA04026>