From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 24 21:46:41 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E3106566C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:46:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A5214D906;
	Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:46:36 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:46:41 -0000

On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> 
> Hey Doug,
> 
> Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening
> ?

Yes, see below.

> If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use
> bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) 

I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it.
That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but
to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for
WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it.


hth,

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection