Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:46:36 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. Message-ID: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> Hey Doug,
>
> Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening
> ?
Yes, see below.
> If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use
> bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old)
I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it.
That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but
to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for
WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F6E40BC.6020400>