From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 30 12:24:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA11258 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scaleablent200.scaleable.com (scaleablent200.scaleable.com [205.208.209.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA11252 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fred.scaleable.com ([205.208.209.23]) by scaleablent200.scaleable.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-0U10) with ESMTP id AAA247 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 15:25:58 -0400 From: myoung@scaleable.com (Fred Young) To: Subject: Multiple network cards Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 15:23:59 -0400 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19970430192558320.AAA247@fred.scaleable.com> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been reading the document "IP Aliasing on FreeBSD 2.x" at http://www.cypher.net/~black/ipalias.html. The document states: This differs from the situation with multiple physical interfaces in a machine which must always have addresses in different IP networks. Why is this? I tried putting multiple physical interfaces in my machine and ifconfig'ed them both to the same network. This worked okay, other machines can access both IP addresses, but I noticed, using a network snooper that all transmits from my machine originated from the first interface, even if it was addressed to the second interface. Is there anything I can do to remedy this?