Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:33 -0800
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Roderick van Domburg <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Reasons for 64-bTT & DHCP import
Message-ID:  <20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl>
References:  <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> 
> > > Also, I am curious why we're not importing ISC DHCP 3 in the base
> > > system. Skimming over the ISC license, I don't see any direct issues.
> > > Once again: don't mean to bash, just curious.
> > 
> > Someone has to feel the need. If it's the maintainer who feels the need,
> > you don't anything else. Otherwise you need enough voices to make the
> > maintainer feel the need to do it. Sometimes there are good reasons to
> > not upgrade. I don't know if that applies here. I don't think so.
> 
> You don't feel there are any reasons not to or you don't feel there are any
> reasons? :-)

I don't think there are specific reasons not to upgrade.

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040315161833.GA10855>