From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 08:18:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321C16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE4B43D2F for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2FGIYXw041996; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i2FGIXmQ010863; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2FGIXl5010862; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:33 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Roderick van Domburg Message-ID: <20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasons for 64-bTT & DHCP import X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:18:34 -0000 On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > > > Also, I am curious why we're not importing ISC DHCP 3 in the base > > > system. Skimming over the ISC license, I don't see any direct issues. > > > Once again: don't mean to bash, just curious. > > > > Someone has to feel the need. If it's the maintainer who feels the need, > > you don't anything else. Otherwise you need enough voices to make the > > maintainer feel the need to do it. Sometimes there are good reasons to > > not upgrade. I don't know if that applies here. I don't think so. > > You don't feel there are any reasons not to or you don't feel there are any > reasons? :-) I don't think there are specific reasons not to upgrade. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net