From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 16 21:30:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD9150D4 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 21:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.39] (helo=softweyr.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 11chxv-0001nZ-00; Sat, 16 Oct 1999 22:30:40 -0600 Message-ID: <38094B9B.33C55A3F@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 22:07:55 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Thorpe Cc: Robert Swindells , elhauge@gene.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and HP Jornado References: <199910161830.LAA28972@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jason Thorpe wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 17:57:37 +0100 (BST) > Robert Swindells wrote: > > > The high end one (820 ?) has a 190MHz SA1100 StrongArm. > > > > I don't think that there is any support in NetBSD/arm32 for either the > > SA1100 or SA1110. > > No, but it probably wouldn't be that hard to make it go :-) The Digital DNARD ran NetBSD/arm, but it was an SA-110. The 1100 is the same processor with more "system support" built in; it shouldn't be much of a leap. Jornada/BSD would be killer. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message