Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:37:31 +0000 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind9 - Imported sources Message-ID: <20040920213731.GA19537@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpvfe8bpcv.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200409190130.i8J1UPZN059043@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040920174914.GA91871@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzp8yb4ddhe.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200409201414.10991.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <xzpvfe8bpcv.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:30:08PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > No, it was a different vendor. :) This is the same vendor: ISC, yes? > > Both bind4 and bind8 lived in src/contrib/bind. > > Actually, BIND 4 and BIND 8 were different versions of the same code > base from two different vendors (Vixie and ISC). > > Meanwhile, nobody involved in this discussion except Doug, Tom and > myself has any idea how much work is actually involved in this, so can > we please keep the bikeshedding to a minimum? Please explain in detail how much work there is. I've done src/contrib imports and maintance for years and I don't even understand the claim. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920213731.GA19537>