From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 1 17:50:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA04381 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 17:50:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu (SICILY.ODYSSEY.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.185.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA04359; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 17:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rvb+@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu) To: obrien@NUXI.com, Satoshi Asami cc: jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/ports/filesystems From: "Robert V. Baron" Date: 01 Oct 1998 20:49:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: David O'Brien's message of Fri, 25 Sep 1998 18:05:49 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The idea is nice but I have not seen any indication that it will exist any time soon and I don't get much feedback when I ask for info. So if I don't hear otherwise, I intend to commit the coda_ ports to /usr/ports/net monday. I really want them in the tree now. For the record, the coda_, stuff is in /usr/pkgsrc/net in NetBSD. Actually, on that side this is viewed as a stop gap measure. In principle, they would like the coda src in the /usr/src since Coda is in the "official" kernel. We decided that it would be inapropriate/inconvenient to put the coda tree in the official tree, since the coda tree uses gmake, configure, ... But the idea that developed is that the Coda tree would eventually appear at a special place in the real tree and be shadowed using std makefiles from the official tree. I am not ready to do this plan at present and expect the coda tree to be reorg'ed a bit. So in the netbsd world, /usr/pkgsrc/net is a temporary expedient. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message