From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 20:57:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E6016A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmpop111.cox.net (eastrmpop111.cox.net [68.230.240.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C73113C45A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080123202815.FJDD4251.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:28:15 -0500 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id gkBv1Y0044iy4EG0000000; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:11:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:29:02 -0600 To: "Andrew Gallatin" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <933741.93778.qm@web33710.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20080121124100.06f2ea93@kan.dnsalias.net> <18327.40474.360956.331813@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <18327.40474.360956.331813@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux) Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: LatencyTOP and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:57:21 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:05:23 -0600, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Alexander Kabaev writes: > > Hope not. This kind of statistics should easily be done with DTrace. > > Indeed, see the thread at > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/dtrace-discuss/2008-January/005439.html > > What is the status of Dtrace in FreeBSD? I thought the original port > was permantly stalled due to licensing conflicts over CDDL, and > that John was starting from scratch. http://dtrace.what-creek.com/ (hasn't been update since Nov 2007) Honestly, I don't understand how CDDL can be conflict with BSD license since it's file based license rather than whole like GPL. Also, it doesn't force BSD license to be change to CDDL. Sun doesn't see any problem for FreeBSD to ship with it either. Feel free to explain more to me in private to avoid license war in this list. Cheers, Mezz > Drew -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org