From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 28 00:42:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A7B106566B for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850B88FC14 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so7634527wwe.31 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZZ4O6u8kqGIz+Zl/Q3CFzQL7jgHUv//uJkQ5nDfjpFA=; b=V2vJCS+AzAP7DhBsYmjJD693aknYiUjJArbSya8plxpYB+pwAMpZL76ftJ+MAt7tux Lmcck2aSXs+FwIMViMIi5ElRZDE1nMpSPUQZP8DQlpaO7MY0PJViMhlJWzmX2bgMWSkU umuXvJyCuueXxvh8+9msSIgGErsLwyfDyAm/M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.205.130 with SMTP id fq2mr32491732wbb.17.1322439064177; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.94.131 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:11:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:11:03 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Adam Stylinski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: ataraid and 9.0 RC-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:42:45 -0000 > I just ran freebsd-update to get up to 9.0-RC2 and discovered that atarai= d does not work. I realize I'm an edge case and my scenario is not ideal (= I use an ITE controller and performance is actually impressively slow), but= I cannot boot 9.0 from my stripe, even after manually loading ataraid from= the loader prompt (after running an unload command). I mention it mostly = because other people using the fakeraid setup by their motherboards for wha= tever reason (perhaps to share a partition table with window > > atapci0 at pci0:2:11:0: class=3D0x010400 card=3D0x00000000 chip=3D0x82= 121283 rev=3D0x13 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Integrated Technology Express (ITE) Inc' > device =3D 'ATA 133 IDE RAID Controller (IT8212F)' > class =3D mass storage > subclass =3D RAID > rl0 at pci0:2:13:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x80ea104d chip=3D0x81= 3910ec rev=3D0x10 hdr=3D0x00 > > At first I figured because it may be loading AHCI (as per the device nami= ng schemes ada0 and ada1). I haven't looked too much into it (these device= s are actually PATA not SATA, so AHCI doesn't even exist for these), but ma= ybe there's an ATA/AHCI driver that's built into the default kernelthat is = interfering with ataraid.ko? Maybe this interferes with my stupidly slow a= nd unpopular configuration. > > Thanks for any help, I'll also have a gander at the new DEFAULTS for the = generic kernel in the 9.0 source tree. ataraid(4) has been deprecated, since it does not work with the new default kernel option ATA_CAM, and some other devices. graid(8) is intended to replace it: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-March/023299.html http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D219974 >