From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 31 02:24:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E82CE4 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 02:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-yh0-x229.google.com (mail-yh0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245955F7 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 02:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 47so199061yhr.28 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 19:24:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=x-received:content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0fq2iaqGKOQc2jaCA0RZMR3OX+o9DcMAKrN69SMpjNQ=; b=cOF7DlbQQyYw4hwgB4h0pQhxfFYsjGJk/fYim79FssnnMf09RJy7PUHlkwc1D0C78Y os17ZmMEfwIUcZjNMN0M0BuVa5hIQe2BMV6lI4H0bRDKwm5qV46lhlou6j0m6aVaajfC +v0opJdU4xJhJGmwr2DgBccoV3Hw3n5xYPLxg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:to:cc:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-gm-message-state; bh=0fq2iaqGKOQc2jaCA0RZMR3OX+o9DcMAKrN69SMpjNQ=; b=cbPwA7U5oJvnA/chRTvc2+yNr0r8A5L4C9Iw+FSLnyNz9EZfTWzgZEdz3XntO918u4 WPjRy3kr+H9/+qUCUPHGfvbX4Zv6YBYG5AbHAePuADOavDKKFWSNDdW6IkFnzY+k3XL8 BWxhLTZTJ9+coUaCGktb5IevBzYTCnuUvD/v4DG/eorFk/BQxQRBsnPOihkvnJgOkxPF aibCsQflpAMUiZ+8E6wQdqfIRu2mV/yuFvTvfIs/xrFZwBPH7ruquIdY7pvdD/+nH5/9 RVwTQDsjNurdchJ6yZ0cCkuzUFYGNVM0RbBZpA6abZH123d8fsvpJ/VQAPwGsazrzBsj t6lA== X-Received: by 10.236.179.203 with SMTP id h51mr4999731yhm.10.1364694912787; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sideswipe.accesso.office ([68.202.42.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z64sm14517564yhc.24.2013.03.30.18.55.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Damien Fleuriot" Subject: Re: Proper way to update ports with svn References: <515607C1.2010701@drenet.info> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:55:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Andre Goree" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.14 (Linux) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnZgxEtIdXBtyie+GggNSHHRuEo4AOPWfiJ/l2BjtG6PxRpQl8XmWgpnG8wDXINaDeAOJD Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 02:24:42 -0000 On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:52:41 -0400, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree wrote: > >> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up >> >> >> /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using >> >> 'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would >> >> seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I should be running 'make >> >> fetchindex' instead? I'm sure I've read about the correct way to do so, >> >> but it doesn't appear to be here: >> >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any advice. > > 'make index' looks good to me, it's the right way to do things imo. > > What bothers you, following 'make index', pkg version output seems dodgy > ? > > Mainly, just the amount of time it takes to run "make index", lol. And the fact that I never had to do so with portsnap. I'm thinking that perhaps portsnap runs something similar to 'make fetchindex' within the whole 'portsnap fetch update' process...? -- Andre Goree andre@drenet.info