From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 20:10:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406191065674 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88C968FC1D for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 20:10:30 -0000 Received: from d178071.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.178.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 22:10:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pAIpXDVipAO4rXZGCLX+96ilMkyom0DzsPk7F5p jdjwUKEPz686li Message-ID: <50411A38.2050700@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:10:32 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kapshuk References: <5041012A.4070603@gmail.com> <50410FD1.5030504@gmx.de> <50411154.9030201@gmail.com> <50411371.50001@gmx.de> <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <504113CF.5060407@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /root/bin and /usr/local/i386-portbld-freebsd9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:10:32 -0000 On 08/31/12 21:43, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 08/31/12 22:41, lokadamus@gmx.de wrote: >> I think it comes from portupgrade. >> I use portmaster, but when i look at google, i found some thinks with >> portupgrade and portbld. >> I think, portbld is building for some ports, but on different places. >> >> Kick it (or rename it), look that all ok and make a upgrade, if >> available. >> If one port need it, it will create it. > Understood. Thanks. > > Any ideas about /root/bin? Not really. It looks like an error like my "tool [". I get this after i would go to head (in february?) and get back this linking. No chance to get of it. Every new buildworld will look for it. :(