From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 2 19:14:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27763 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:14:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA27756 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:14:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 0zaWus-0001ZT-00; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:13:58 -0800 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:13:54 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Andrew Kenneth Milton cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Memory Usage under -current In-Reply-To: <199811021418.AAA25420@zeus.theinternet.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 3 Nov 1998, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: > I'm just comparing the sizes of processes under an ELF -current > and a 2.2.5 system, and my recollections of what my machine used to look > like. > > It seems that a lot more memory is being consumed by the ELF system.. You should compare a 3.0 aout to a 3.0 elf system. I belive the memory size reporting has changed significantly between 2.2.x and 3.0, and these reporting changes are what you are seeing. I don't think 2.2.x included certain shared objects in its count. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message