Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Mar 1999 20:30:09 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        chris@tci.com
Cc:        dan@dna.tsolab.org, mmercer@ipass.net, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, me@T-F-I.freeserve.co.uk, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Confusion
Message-ID:  <36F23541.FCCF8497@newsguy.com>
References:  <199903190540.WAA07008@lazlo.tci.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
chris@tci.com wrote:
> 
> Look, the NT admins I know who are getting their feet wet are doing it
> of their own free will - they're wanting to check out what all the hype
> about OSS and the like is about.  They go to retail stores, check out
> the packaging, and buy what they think is the "better" product.  I'm
> happy as Hell they're doing this, but do we really want to be confusing
> people from the very start.  Remember the Betamax?

All .0 versions of all softwares are more unstable than the previous
older version (btw, 2.2.8 was released after 3.0, but that is *way*
beside the point :). That is a *fact*. Sure, you might be able to
come up with a handful of exceptions, but that's all they are:
exceptions.

More important to this thread, *NONE* of these exceptions came from
Microsoft. Whatever .0 version you buy from Microsoft, that is going
to be more unstable than the former highest version.

So, FreeBSD is perfect in line with MS on this one <shivers>. This
is not a policy decision. It is intrinsic to the whole concept of a
.0 release.

So, it comes down to this: we are doing no worse than anyone else.
We *certainly* are doing no worse than the environment you say this
people came from. And, just to hammer it down, that 3.0 is more
unstable than 2.2.8 will most likely go unnoticed by then. Unless
they actually get down to learn more about FreeBSD, start asking
questions, and then are told 2.2.8 would have been better for them.
At which point they can be enlightened about all these fine points.

The only possible complain is about the *quality* of 3.0. 3.0 had
it's problems, and they are mentioned in the errata, which is
mentioned on the back of the cd case. It was not exactly a "bad"
product, though. Just by *our* standards...

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"What happened?"
	"It moved, sir!"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36F23541.FCCF8497>