From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 14 17:57:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8062B106566C; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DA78FC0A; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6EHvB3k006156; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:57:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4E1F2DF7.3080700@missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:57:11 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pav@FreeBSD.org" References: <201107121826.00020.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <201107131857.36772.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E1E9C79.6080105@FreeBSD.org> <4E1F200D.1080002@missouri.edu> <1310666060.23182.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1310666060.23182.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "demon@FreeBSD.org" , "lioux@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , Jung-uk Kim , Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:57:12 -0000 On 07/14/2011 12:54 PM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 14. 07. 2011 v 11:57 -0500: > >> entry. I assume that the filename of the desktop entry is unimportant, > > The filename of desktop entry should be 100% inconsequential, and our > only care should be not have two ports installing same file. > >> and is used only internally by Gnome or whatever. > > Sounds like a bug to me. This means I am still not understanding it fully then. >> But maybe it would have been better to have had one more entry in >> DESKTOP_ENTRIES that was the actual filename of the desktop entry. > > Yes, but is it worth the effort? Note you'll have to introduce it > somehow not to break existing ports. I agree. It is a lot of work.