Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 21:59:31 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: jkh@FreeBSD.org (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Optimizing CVS? Message-ID: <199502020559.VAA02884@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <6912.791680896@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 1, 95 03:21:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Profiling cvs doesn't show much in-core file system activity. I think > > it's just spending too much time waiting to write metadata and temporary > > files to the disk. This is nothing new, so it's not clear why 1.1.5 > > was faster. > > So.. Um.. Now that you've measured it, how do we *fix* it? :-) How much time does cvs actually spend fork/exec'ing rcs ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> TRW Financial Systems, Inc. FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502020559.VAA02884>