From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 24 10:52:04 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577B2133E997
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch)
Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch (mail2.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.protonmail.ch",
 Issuer "QuoVadis Global SSL ICA G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74AD8193E
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:52:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:51:54 +0000
To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
From: Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch>
Reply-To: Lorenzo Salvadore <phascolarctos@protonmail.ch>
Subject: Re: category qt?
Message-ID: <Kkg0blDufYenYnbz3wSfMB29NtRuhodim5SprNcD_rfhvuZZd5f4eDCo4jfmShZqBC8ICfIx-dIiKJCF4BXiWWAP7BNkmSMzGHo8rI8bsnc=@protonmail.ch>
In-Reply-To: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at>
References: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at>
Feedback-ID: X6az_D2smWSR8MT5MHqXnWF0upxehDyHia7Id1cbayHNBUkRu3CIeusDsZHiivIIjmaKB1_OofpALrRUYjNz3w==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E74AD8193E
X-Spamd-Bar: ------
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:52:04 -0000

> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
>
> It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I
> think it is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).

Indeed it is a bit annoying for me when I have to update qt* ports.
I don't use portmaster or similar (I don't like them): I wrote my own
utility, but it has still some issues, such as this one. I guess having
all the qt* ports in the same category would help.

Lorenzo Salvadore.