From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 8 09:04:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C8016B074 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaa@ulstu.ru) Received: from kernel.ulstu.ru (kernel.ulstu.ru [62.76.34.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C7B43D48 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 06:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zaa@ulstu.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kernel.ulstu.ru (ulstuMail) with ESMTP id 273714AC90; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:39:16 +0400 (MSD) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ulstu.ru Received: from kernel.ulstu.ru ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kernel.ulstu.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lMzI9kYoNhEa; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:39:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.ulstu.ru (orion.ulstu.ru [62.76.34.33]) by kernel.ulstu.ru (ulstuMail) with ESMTP id 2A4D54AC1C for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:39:10 +0400 (MSD) Received: by orion.ulstu.ru (Postfix, from userid 3909) id 285A51A17; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:39:10 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:39:10 +0400 From: Alexander Zhuravlev To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060608063909.GA9230@orion.ulstu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: PR ports/97734 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:04:59 -0000 Hello, Could someone please take care of the PR? [PATCH] update of sysutils/pecl-fileinfo to 1.0.3 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/97734 Attached patch file upgrades pecl-fileinfo port to version 1.0.3 and at the same time fixes magic file path determination on FreeBSD 5.x, 6.x systems (/usr/share/misc/file path was not detected correctly). Maintainer timeout: 2 weeks. Thank you. ps. By the way, I can take maintainership of the port if current maintainer do not have any objections. -- Alexander Zhuravlev