From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 16:00:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E85F1065686 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0FA8FC17 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m75G0AlU077357 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:00:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m75G0ALv077356; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:00:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:00:10 GMT Message-Id: <200808051600.m75G0ALv077356@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Tom Rhodes Cc: Subject: Re: docs/119907: Ports compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tom Rhodes List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:00:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/119907; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Rhodes To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: p2nd8vp02@sneakemail.com Subject: Re: docs/119907: Ports compatibility Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:50:52 -0400 Hi, > By the description alone, it doesn't describe that it supports -RELEASE or -RELEASE-p# systems. The problem is that using "-RELEASE" and/or "-RELEASE-pN" systems is that it makes the support coverage too broad. Where I work we have a few 4.11 RELEASE systems and one 4.4 RELEASE system but the ports collection doesn't support the latter. In fact, to make a later version work, I had to patch several base utilities to get certain software installed. The -CURRENT and -STABLE is pretty good for right now. If you can come up with something that covers the possibility of several releases then please do. :) Thanks, -- Tom Rhodes