From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 16 8:10:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from lunatic.oneinsane.net (lunatic.oneinsane.net [207.113.133.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DDC37BE95; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:10:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from insane@lunatic.oneinsane.net) Received: by lunatic.oneinsane.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8EC11198; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:10:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:10:27 -0800 From: Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: vanilla@FreeBSD.org Subject: Enlightenment's Epplets Message-ID: <20000316081027.A21371@lunatic.oneinsane.net> Reply-To: Ron Rosson Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lunatic.oneinsane.net 3.4-STABLE X-Moon: The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (86% of Full) X-Opinion: What you read here is my IMHO X-Disclaimer: I am a firm believer in RTFM X-WWW: http://www.oneinsane.net X-PGP-KEY: http://www.oneinsane.net/~insane/insane2-pgp5i.txt X-Uptime: 8:06AM up 22:07, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone noticed that the Enlightenment epplets do not do anyone much good when they are still LINUX specific. What is the use in having it in ports if most of the items fail to work. Is anyone working on getting them to work with FreeBSD. If not why have it in the tree. TIA -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user said ... The InSaNe One rm -rf * insane@oneinsane.net and all was /dev/null and *void() ------------------------------------------------------------------- I love deadlines. I especially love the swooshing sound they make as they go flying by. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message