Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:09:19 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Opteron Server with -STABLE ... Message-ID: <20031009110919.GA7889@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031008210133.K759@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20031008210133.K759@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:03:48PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >=20 > Is there a current opinion on this? I heard that costs have come down to > 'close to dual xeon' prices, but is it safe to run -STABLE on it? Other > then memory allocation above 4g, are we seeing any benefits right now with > running this? Or are we dealin with 'running 32 bit apps on a 64 bit > arch' still? FreeBSD 4.x does not support 64-bit mode on amd64 machines (so all the usual i386 VM limitations, etc), you'll have to use 5.x. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/hUHfWry0BWjoQKURAjfqAJ9YOzLA/c6KAgjo1JPbjVcQKN/+JACfbaFK pfVXr355UtiFjFQppt0pLKc= =6xld -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031009110919.GA7889>