From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 02:21:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D7616A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nbh-gw.newchem.ru (novbytchem-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.149.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CAA43D20 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 02:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([192.168.204.4]) by nbh-gw.newchem.ru (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id hB9ALhAF012239 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:21:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web (http://www.drweb.net) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:21:43 +0300 From: Illia Baidakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <92721135.20031209132143@newchem.ru> To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <448yln40ey.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1264617800.20031208170645@newchem.ru> <448yln40ey.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: Re2: 'long long' warning while compiling mit-kerberos on 4.9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Illia Baidakov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:21:47 -0000 Hello Lowell, >> In file included from /usr/include/sys/param.h:98, >> from ftp_var.h:111, >> from ./cmdtab.c:39: >> /usr/include/sys/signal.h:230: redefinition of `my_sig_t' >> ftp_var.h:62: `my_sig_t' previously declared here >> ./cmdtab.c:35: warning: `sccsid' defined but not used >> *** Error code 1 LG> That is a very complicated piece of software to try to port on your LG> own as a first effort. It should be quite possible to get it running, LG> but it will require some understanding of programming and the use of LG> compilers. There are a lot of documentation about this technology such as RFCs, user's and administrator's guides, papers over the net and guru advises. All that I did was commnted the string 230 in /usr/include/sys/signal.h After that the building process has complited succesfully. Equally as installing and checking ones. I hope this change will not cause any serious problems with running kerberos applications and will not open security breachs. At the end I have turned the changes back. So I trying to ask you ones again: Is it a best practise to use Heimdal Kerberos on FreeBSD? If it's so I think I have no limits to orientate myself to use it. -- Best regards, a mailto:a@newchem.ru