From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 16:17:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D694F16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:17:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A87A43D1D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i060HRN1072517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:17:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i060HFMO027770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:17:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i060HFBE039982; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:17:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i060HDFC039980; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:17:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:17:12 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: corbesero@cs.moravian.edu Message-ID: <20040106001712.GF39786@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200401051651.i05Gp6w14785@catwoman.cs.moravian.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401051651.i05Gp6w14785@catwoman.cs.moravian.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is vinum in current working for anyone X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:17:37 -0000 On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:51:06AM -0500, Stephen Corbesero wrote: > > > I have been unable to use vinum in current since about 5.1. I have > just sent debugging information to Greg Lehey, but I was wondering if > it is working for anyone and how our configurations differ. It's running fine for me on serveral alpha and i386 systems. > If rc.conf specifies vinum_start="YES", my system usually crashes as soon as > vinum loads and starts scanning disks. Sometimes it doesn't crash, > but the vinum config is lost on at least one of the vinum drives. The (allmost) canoncial reason for this is if the module is out of sync with your kernel. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de