From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  7 19:28:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AA316A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  7 Jun 2004 19:28:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info (papendorf-se.de [217.160.222.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0605D43D46
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  7 Jun 2004 19:28:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@nagilum.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6AFF92F4118; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (p15140542 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 25452-10; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net (stgt-d9bb38c6.pool.mediaWays.net
	[217.187.56.198])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 12DE92F405B; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C268E3F9EBF;
	Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (cakebox.tis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 33845-04; Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nagilum.org (scorpio.tis [10.1.1.4])
	by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C871C3F9D62;
	Mon,  7 Jun 2004 21:27:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <40C4C1B6.2040808@nagilum.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:27:50 +0200
From: Nagilum <freebsd@nagilum.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
	rv:1.5.1) Gecko/20031120
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Reed L. O'Brien" <reedobrien@acm.org>
References: <c9tsc1$eec$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <c9tsc1$eec$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cakebox.homeunix.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at papendorf-se.de
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pf
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:28:01 -0000

Not just CURRENT, you can have pf on STABLE too:
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/
ALTQ is not ready for all interfaces but the apart from that it's fully 
functional.
Have fun,
Alex.

Reed L. O'Brien wrote:

> I thought I read in the CURRENT docs somewhere that pf was going to be 
> the default packet filter.  Was I hallucinating?  Anyone seen it?
>
> Also anyone using pf on FreeBSD 5.x?
> Is it fully implemented?  is it as solid as ipfilter?
> I have never used ipfw or ipfw2 so please don't refer to them without 
> great detail on their part of the comparison....I won't get it
>
> TIA