Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:13:35 -0500
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        alk@pobox.com
Cc:        julian@whistle.com, cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: clustering/load balancing 
Message-ID:  <62642.922130015@gjp.erols.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:46:22 CST." <14070.29383.300007.474845@avalon.east> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Kimball wrote in message ID
<14070.29383.300007.474845@avalon.east>:
> Quoth Gary Palmer on Mon, 22 March:
> : even if you remove that SPoF, you leave others (mainly between the `load 
> : balancer' and the actual servers, unless you've figured out a way to have 
> : redundant NIC's in your servers)
> 
> You don't need physically redundant nic in order to have multiple
> load balancers:  The servers don't care whether packets are routed to
> them through nic 1 or nic 2.  

But how do you route back out? Running gated is one answer I guess...
Not one I'd readily choose.

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62642.922130015>