From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  8 17:15:49 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF8116A41F;
	Tue,  8 Nov 2005 17:15:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org)
Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by green.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA8HFlVP099340;
	Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:15:47 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org)
Received: (from green@localhost)
	by green.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA8HFi5I099339;
	Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:15:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green)
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:15:44 -0500
From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org>
To: Marko Cuk <cuk@cuk.nu>
Message-ID: <20051108171544.GI37350@green.homeunix.org>
References: <436FDC90.3020108@cuk.nu>
	<20051108013645.GE37350@green.homeunix.org>
	<4370AA76.8000309@cuk.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4370AA76.8000309@cuk.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Tun and ALTQ
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:15:50 -0000

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
> It seems that it work. Thanks.
> 
> Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q)  you should specify "em", for "tun", vice 
> versa... what a mess, hehe.

No prob; I don't see why using the em(4) backing the tun(4) wouldn't
work for ALTQ _IF_ you actually tagged the (PPPoE?) traffic on em(4).
I think that might be really hard, though, so for ALTQ you should
probably just specify the "logical" interface that you intend to
limit (that would be the IP tun(4) rather than the PPPoE em(4)).

Do you have suggestion on what would be good text to go into pf.conf(5)
so that this particular case is documented?

-- 
Brian Fundakowski Feldman                           \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
  <> green@FreeBSD.org                               \  The Power to Serve! \
 Opinions expressed are my own.                       \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\