Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:26:18 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: Hidetoshi Shimokawa <simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RBC support patch Message-ID: <20020221132618.A26495@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <ybsit8rvyj6.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>; from simokawa@sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp on Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:56:29PM %2B0900 References: <ybs1yfgybmq.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <200202201936.g1KJaAO07448@uriah.heep.sax.de> <200202202359.g1KNxeI41069@aslan.scsiguy.com> <200202201936.g1KJaAO07448@uriah.heep.sax.de> <ybsit8rvyj6.wl@ett.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > > They are not broken. READ(6)/WRITE(6) are not mandatory for direct > > access devices by the standard, but READ(10)/WRITE(10) are. > > If this was true, FreeBSD is broken X-) No, see my followup. Both READ(6) and READ(10) are mandatory, even in SCSI-2. I've obviously confused this with WRITE(6) and WRITE(10) which are both optional. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221132618.A26495>