Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 11:15:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@gold.amis.net> To: Martin Husemann <martin@rumolt.teuto.de> Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Callback Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980413111308.362A-100000@gold.amis.net> In-Reply-To: <199804130814.KAA01197@rumolt.teuto.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes - otherwise you'll pay for the connection, at least here in Germany. Yes I know, same thing here in slovenia. > I've never seen someone actually use the second type due to its obvious > disadvantages. It may be usefull if you travel, call in from an unknown > number and want to be called back at that number. I *have* to use the second type of callback because the remote end (a Livingston PM3) does not yet support D-channel-type callback (i.e. the one that is free for the caller). I was using a callback setup with bisdn without any problems so I just tried "porting" my configuration to i4b but failed for obvious reasons. Oh well, there are two possibilities right now, I will first try to bug Livingston to finally implement D-channel callback and then I'll go and hack i4b to make it support the other type of callback that I was using with bisdn (if I don't get lost in the i4b source :). Blaz Zupan, blaz@medinet.si, http://home.amis.net/blaz Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980413111308.362A-100000>