From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 1 11:34: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com (smtp11.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A663151FE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:33:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost.nowhere (ppp18334.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.130.14]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA28580; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:36:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.nowhere (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA48806; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:34:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:34:48 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Message-ID: <19990701143448.A48778@mad> References: <19990701105843.C22489@mad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from Jason C. Wells on Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:36:01AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:36:01AM -0400, Jason C. Wells wrote: > > If you recall, you tried to restrict me from giving the answer I am giving > now by asking only for a yes/no/i dont care answer. I obliged you. Hehe. It was actually meant to have the effect opposite of trying to restrict you. :) Sorry for the misunderstanding. We don't use proper sentences in comments because they're bulky if you read several of them in a list, you'll notice a strong tendency towards needless repetition ("Foojoy is a program that ...", "This allows you to ..."). The pkg/COMMENT is often used as an addendum to pkgname, for example, Greg Lehey's book lists "package-name | category | comment". -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message