From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 27 02:39:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA07607 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 02:39:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA07600 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 02:39:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (IDENT:OuSOqA/pAOJoDVuCVne1rxlxI42l+ihI@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA20426; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:38:50 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199809270938.LAA20426@gratis.grondar.za> To: John Birrell cc: brian@worldcontrol.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xanim and linuxELF.o In-Reply-To: Your message of " Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:35:51 +1000." <199809270935.TAA23250@cimlogic.com.au> References: <199809270935.TAA23250@cimlogic.com.au> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:38:49 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Birrell wrote: > Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > produces working code. Are elf objects interchangable in this way among > > > all elf systems? Is this supposed to work? > > > > Only if there are no syscalls. > > What about the code being compiled against header files that differ > from those in our libc? Does stdio work? Er... :-) s/syscalls/syscalls and library calls/ It works if the supplied routine(s) is(are) self-contained. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message