From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 8 16:39:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA16658 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 16:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nscfw.iafrica.com (6TvW9xQkKOFXqJZmYkVD8QypJXIPsT7+@nscfw.iafrica.com [196.31.1.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA16646 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 16:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bradh by nscfw.iafrica.com with smtp (Exim 1.651 #3) id 0wljq6-0007c8-00; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 01:38:34 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 01:38:34 +0200 (SAT) From: Brad Hendrickse To: Kevin Eliuk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Hi, does anyone know if it's possible to set either 'ppp' or 'pppd' up > > for manual or operator assisted dial? I need to establish a connection > > across an analogue leased line which requires the above. > > Do you mean using: > > set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \"\" > AT&FM0 OK-AT-OK \\dATDP\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" > ^^^^ > for pulse dial as opposed to ATDT for tone dial. > Check your modem owners manual. No, it's going to be a dead line (no dial tone at all). Basically, I need to fool the modem into thinking I'm going to be dialing for it (Linux and Win95 can do it, surely FreeBSD can ;)) Does 'ppp' or 'pppd' support that? TIA --brad I'm a FreeBSD user-- Fortune: You cannot achieve the impossible without attempting the absurd.