From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 12 12:34:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BB416A407
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:34:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC7443D69
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.2])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1GN7T6-000FJg-0R
	for freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:34:24 +0400
Message-ID: <4506A950.4000805@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:34:24 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: packages names are wrong
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:34:26 -0000

Who cares of packages on
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml ?

Names of the packages are wrong. They confuse our ports/packages tools
because of a dot before arch names. The tools treat a package version
starts after the first dot.

It makes troubles for e.g. portaudit that claims a package
diablo-jdk-freebsd5.i386.1.5.0.07.00 vulnerabled:

Affected package: diablo-jdk-freebsd5.i386.1.5.0.07.00
Type of problem: jdk -- jar directory traversal vulnerability.
Reference:
<http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/18e5428f-ae7c-11d9-837d-000e0c2e438a.html>

It's because of this:

% pkg_version -t i386.1.5.0.07.00 1.3.1.0_1
<

It could be fixed e.g. by replacing the dot with a dash:

diablo-jdk-freebsd5-i386.1.5.0.07.00

But the package name should be fixed in the package itself, so it should
be rerolled.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.