From owner-freebsd-java Wed Apr 15 17:24:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA05850 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cimlogic.com.au (cimlogic.com.au [203.36.2.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05751 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 17:24:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by cimlogic.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.7) id KAA00867 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:06:48 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199804160006.KAA00867@cimlogic.com.au> Subject: JDK version numbers To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:06:47 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone had difficulty handling JDK version numbers like: "jdk1.1.5-FreeBSD:1998/02/08" I realise that this accurately identifies the jdk we're using, but it makes it pretty difficult to check for "1.1.2" or later (like JFC expects you to do). If the date is necessary, I'd prefer to see it added to java.vendor: "Sun Microsystems Inc., port by java-port@mt.sri.com 1998/02/08" and leave java.version: "1.1.5" -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message