Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:37:58 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa <root@pukruppa.de> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome2.9 ??? Message-ID: <20041126150522.X825@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <opshzm69099aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <20041118060627.N7991@pukruppa.net> <opshykweun9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <opshzm69099aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:45:12 +0100 (CET), Peter Ulrich Kruppa
> <root@pukruppa.de> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:12:41 +0100 (CET), Peter Ulrich Kruppa
>>> <root@pukruppa.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is gnome2.9 ready for testing?
>>>
>>> Yes, it is now. Have fun! :-)
>> I just started gnome_upgrade28.sh
>>
>> in two days or so we will know more.
>
> With the recently update of nautilus 2.9.1 now broke everything. We will have
> to wait for the other stuff to catch up. I am using Fluxbox as my backup WM..
"The Big Upgrade" is finished now.
At least I have got gnome2-power-tools and gnome2-office upgraded
to 2.9.1 and no damage was done.
During gnome_upgrade28.sh I had to set links from
libgobject-2.0.so.400
libgmodule-2.0.so.400
libgthread-2.0.so.400
libglib-2.0.400
to their latest versions (...505).
Regards,
Uli.
+---------------------------+
| Peter Ulrich Kruppa |
| Wuppertal |
| Germany |
+---------------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041126150522.X825>