From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 20 14:00:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802A1065674 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [161.58.222.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F76C8FC27 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.217.128] (c-76-27-80-223.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [76.27.80.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by gritton.org (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n2KE0uoC056812; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:00:57 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <49C39368.4090208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:00:24 -0600 From: Jamie Gritton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090109) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org References: <49B55CA2.7090300@FreeBSD.org> <49B980E1.30203@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <49B980E1.30203@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9144/Fri Mar 20 04:51:14 2009 on gritton.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Problem using bz's multi-IP/IPv6/No-IP Jail Patch (7-STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:00:59 -0000 I wrote: > Here's a patch for ifconfig. It allows "ifconfig -a" and a few other > similar informative ifconfig options to run inside an IPv4-less jail > (of course trying to set anything still fails). Outside of a jail, you > should see no change. Apply it inside your /usr/src tree, and install > it both in the root system (under /sbin) and in your jails > (/usr/jails/TEMPLATE or wherever). Just in case I broke something, keep > a copy of the old one :-). But I've tested it on my own system so I > don't expect anything to be broken. The patch went in as r189864 on CURRENT and r189970 on STABLE. But the fix brought up some other issues, and now the STABLE patch has been reverted. It may come back in time for 7.2 if everything looks good in CURRENT, but that's not a sure thing given the release schedule. - Jamie