From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 11:14:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388B21065673 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5A38FC17 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so3671931fxm.13 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94CCHLJ3JCUuEuo2LqQJAzOaJAp/7971bSrshDNGqv4=; b=dtk8dbzzW940bKjvutwkiq9z7YjO50LmeSNFPZC6iXr5rc85NsdCxQwOug38d6VtNZ 86vt9dBEV4U5MnK/K3La7dV3vSWC+WOydYKyNMWW6Sel+bqiqgnyqAmmjxbHDRbEPrJo Hi7+Jrp+o4YpWwWL1EYFKAZvOxE9udXq9jahQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SPLb8u15/MI9nmqIOuqLSY4QC287+fbosMZ0KFlB4zMe89LJ6Ze22CHLYNG0rIOgFZ 2JAXI0ODtjswlmRW2DWh1c/a/qc/dS5bIMc9zjO2aadld0LRfTrWIKUz6FhyIy1be+S7 jVN4BAl0pmzDFIwiucwyjwnnGdRPmSYCOLiCU= Received: by 10.223.4.217 with SMTP id 25mr6963461fas.60.1276600483126; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E29DC.dip.t-dialin.net [87.142.41.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6sm6016671fam.7.2010.06.15.04.14.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:14:41 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Victor Sudakov Message-ID: <20100615131441.5b82d4eb@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100615022837.GB23583@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <4B408745.3030309@andric.com> <20100103154503.GA63734@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20100103221655.GA76049@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100104130315.GA79633@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20100104133657.GA47668@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20100104143749.GA80433@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20100104223631.GC41129@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100105064720.GA94590@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20100614044308.GA4670@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <09f445615c18768df17418f06d872a46.squirrel@www.noacks.org> <20100615022837.GB23583@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:14:45 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:28:37 +0700 Victor Sudakov wrote: > Jonathan Noack wrote: > > >> But to hell with this. I started the topic because I think something > > >> is wrong with SVN to CVS export, which upsets cvsup and causes > > >> "Checksum mismatch" errors. Is anybody willing to look at it? > > > > > > I see nobody is ever going to fix this? Cvsup mails me a bunch of > > > "Checksum mismatch" errors on every run, with a risk of overlooking > > > real errors. > > > > > > How do others deal with this noise? Do you grep cvsup output or what? > > > > Seems like newer versions of CVS break assumptions made by CVSup on the > > ordering of branch revisions: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs/2009-August/002083.html > > > > "So, in short I don't see any easy solutions to this, and especially given > > the fact that in the long run CVS/CVSup will probably be replaced by > > something else for distributing FreeBSD source, I don't think it will be > > that easy to find someone to "fix" either CVSup or CVS." > > Thanks for the link. Somebody wrote here that the problem was perhaps > in the svn2cvs script, but Simon's post gives a different outlook. > > Maybe nobody is going to fix CVSup (is it not actively developed > already?), but csup is relatively recent and alive. Once it has a CVS > mode, maybe it could be adjusted? > csup already has a CVS mode, at least in 9-current. I don't use older versions of FreeBSD so I don't know whether it supports CVS there. -- Gary Jennejohn