From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 11:13:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0067D37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4017843F75 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 11:13:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82036D3; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:13:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0904E78C66; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:13:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 13:13:47 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Craig Boston Message-ID: <20030505181347.GA19469@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Craig Boston , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20030505052615.R2996@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1052156596.38008.4.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1052156596.38008.4.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 18:13:50 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 12:43:17PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > I use MIT Kerberos installed via the port and have always had to make > absolutely sure to NOT install the base system with Heimdal KRB5, lest > other ports pick up the wrong header files. This was possible before > with a custom install. Please send a bug report to the port maintainer ... the port is broken if you cannot build it with a different Kerberos implementation. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se