From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 28 04:41:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBA3B1EA25 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0100B1F9D for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 005A7B1EA24; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4237B1EA23 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC8FE1F9B for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1avdla-000FMR-OD; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:41:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:41:30 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Bob Eager Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reviving deleted port Message-ID: <20160428044130.GZ2282@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160428021556.459c2ceb@raksha.tavi.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160428021556.459c2ceb@raksha.tavi.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:41:34 -0000 Hi! > This relates to ftp/rexx-curl. > > This was deleted after failing to build with the latest version of > curl. I didn't notice for a while (I was going through a period when I > couldn't update my ports tree). It is no longer in the ports tree at > all. > > The problem turned out to be just an uninitialised variable! I have > made some other fixes related to the new curl. Very nice! > QUESTION: Do I submit this as a 'new' port? Or is there some mechanism > for a deleted port? Please submit it and mention to revive the old port with some changes. > (I am willing to take over maintainership) That's necessary for 'new' or 'revived' ports. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !