From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:20:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4016723E for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Received: from smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (smtp-sofia.digsys.bg [193.68.3.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FD37CF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dcave.digsys.bg (dcave.digsys.bg [192.92.129.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1LBMC75088377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Message-ID: <51260364.5040104@digsys.bg> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:22:12 +0200 From: Daniel Kalchev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130125 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> <51250E61.8080209@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:20:03 -0000 On 21.02.13 04:23, Greg Miller wrote: > On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree wrote: >> What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build >> stuff from the relative future? > I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and > gcc47 wouldn't produce a working executable at all for a long time > (and continue to fail) on my 9.0 and 9.1 systems. There's been so much > libreoffice breakage that I don't even bother reporting it or making > much effort to fix it. I just reboot to Windows for the cases where I > need a working libreoffice. I don't much care whether gcc 4.2 produces > a working libreoffice; I just wish something did. Did you build the Windows version yourself from source? If not, why you just don't get the binary WhateverOffice for FreeBSD and be done with this "problem"? That will surely save you the reboots. At least. Daniel