From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Apr 24 11:07:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA16335 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:07:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA16295; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:07:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcs@znep.com) Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost) by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id MAA22418; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:07:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA28003; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:03:31 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:03:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Marc Slemko To: Open Systems Networking cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: *** Real Action Item: SPECweb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Open Systems Networking wrote: > Well it isnt by CHOICE :) > We don't have an alpha port yet. I still think we can pound novell's #'s > 10 times over with a good selection of x86 hardware. If you think that then you are wrong. Going into this with this sort of expectation will result in nothing but heartbreak. You may be able to come close to them if you got a good Zeus port to FreeBSD. You won't with Apache. I'm not trying to be negative, just trying to make reality crystal clear. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message