From owner-freebsd-gnome  Sun Feb 16  4:30:19 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E424B37B401
	for <gnome@hub.freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BB143F85
	for <gnome@hub.freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1GCUHNS020256
	for <gnome@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1GCUHft020255;
	Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200302161230.h1GCUHft020255@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: gnome@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: "J.D." <jimd@siu.edu>
Subject: Re: ports/48311: compile of librsvg2 fails with "bad" c++ code
Reply-To: "J.D." <jimd@siu.edu>
Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-gnome.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-gnome>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

The following reply was made to PR ports/48311; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "J.D." <jimd@siu.edu>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, jimd@siu.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/48311: compile of librsvg2 fails with "bad" c++ code
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 05:09:38 +0000

 I found the solution to my problem: not replacing libart_lpgl, but 
 removing libart, which strangely enough provides "libart_lgpl.so.5" 
 whereas /usr/ports/graphics/libart_lpgl2 provides "libart_lgpl_2.so.5".
 
 I was "removing" 'libart_lgpl2" ('libart_lgpl_2') as its port and 
 directory name was inherently related to in the suggested resolution of 
 removing "the old libart_lgpl", but unknowingly leaving "libart" 
 ('libart_lgpl') in place.
 
 Deleting the "libart-2.3.3" port took care of librsvg2's compile 
 problems, so this PR can be closed.
 
 HOWEVER, I would like to suggest that "libart" (2.3.3) be renamed to 
 "libart_lgpl" so it will conform to the name of the libary it installs, 
 and would indicate a older version of "libart_lgpl_2". There would be 
 less, possibly, confusion over the NAME of the port/package and the NAME 
 of the libraries/files installed, and it would be easier to 
 differentiate between it and the "libart_lgpl2" port/package.
 
 Thank you.
 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message